Repository source: docs/plans/import_record_failure_isolation_debug_log.md
Import record failure isolation — Railspike debug log
2026-10-23T18:19:32Z — Step 1 handoff
Necessary/useful instructions
docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step1_solution_assessment.md, Structure and Guardrails: comparing a targeted fix, bounded record-failure isolation and blanket exception suppression clarified the safe recommendation without implementing it. Retain the comparison and explicit Step 1 approval gate.docs/railspike/RAILSPIKE.md, Experimental Effort Estimation: standing enrollment and exposure disclosure preserve the prior diagnostic work without inventing a pre-inspection score. Retain the distinction between projected total and measured effort.
Redundant/unnecessary instructions
No supported findings.
Inapplicable instructions
Step 3/4 organization, branching and implementation commits do not apply to this Step 1 request; leave these planning artifacts uncommitted.
Uncertain assessments
The one-page limit is approximate in Markdown, particularly with required study metadata; the substantive comparison remains concise. Consider distinguishing the assessment body from mandatory bookkeeping in future guidance.
2026-10-26 — Direct repair after resumed review
Necessary/useful instructions
RAILSPIKE.md, state recovery: the prior Step 1 artifact exposed that this exact bug had been diagnosed but left pending, preventing an invented new-cycle or prior-fix narrative. Retain history restoration.
RAILSPIKE.md, effort snapshots: retained the original 0.45 and disclosed the missing prospective v2 score instead of backfilling. Retain that distinction.
Redundant/unnecessary instructions
No supported findings.
Inapplicable instructions
The user explicitly directed building the fix after review. Pending staged planning gates are overridden for this bounded repair; do not manufacture approvals or restart the assessment.
Uncertain assessments
The broader Option B assessment remains incomplete while its immediate defect is repaired. The linked plain-text review explicitly separates the two outcomes; no universal isolation claim is supported.