Invite zero-click workflow debug log

2026-10-15T18:59:51Z — Step 1

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step1_solution_assessment.md, Structure and Review and revision. Comparing alternatives and keeping the original request separate from the recommendation made the permanent-key versus temporary-session choice explicit. Retain these requirements.
Source: docs/railspike/RAILSPIKE.md, Commit discipline and Debug mode. The project marker established enabled mode, and the draft remains uncommitted with its state recorded. Retain durable state and commit boundaries.

No supported findings.

Source: docs/railspike/RAILSPIKE.md, instruction reprint rule. Full reprinting contributes substantial conversation length relative to a one-page assessment; its benefit for this review is uncertain. Consider whether a linked acknowledgment could suffice in future workflow revisions.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step2_feature_description.md, Risks and Completion boundary. Required early validation exposed same-key later naming and interrupted redemption as prerequisites rather than assuming existing support. Retain these fields.
Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step2_feature_description.md, Shared component inventory. Mapping issuance, identity, authentication, and identity displays keeps the feature centered on the complete normal journey. Retain this requirement.

No supported findings.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step2_feature_description.md, Deliverable and Structure. The one-page goal competes with the required inventory and recovery/risks for this cross-surface feature; retain concision but consider a word budget instead of an ambiguous rendered page limit.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step2_feature_description.md, Core requirements and Success criteria. Adding opt-in destination prefilling to both makes the requested originating-page behavior reviewable; retain these fields. Inspection confirmed the current checkbox is unchecked but the source page is only a suggestion, not a prefill.

No supported findings.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_do.md, Key Risks and dependencies. Inspection showed no same-key naming API and explicit rejection of redeemed/approved identities; prerequisite stages and ownership verification address those concrete gaps. Retain dependency/risk requirements.
Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_after.md, approval and commit gates. The plan is reviewable without runtime changes or premature commits. Retain these gates.

No supported findings.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_do.md, one-page limit and six fields per stage. Seven stages require 42 mandatory fields plus contract/risks; even compressed, ordinary rendering exceeds one page. Consider a per-stage word limit rather than a fixed rendered-page limit; required coverage was retained.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step4_implementation_do.md, Stage Boundary Protocol. Seven separate stage commits each include the summary, and the planning-only commit precedes implementation. This made prerequisites and verification independently reviewable; retain the protocol.
Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step4_implementation_after.md, Completion Contract verification. Real-browser public/private journeys caught the need to cover pending keys, interrupted responses, storage denial, and unavailable resources beyond isolated endpoints. Retain normal-entry and recovery verification.

No supported findings.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step4_implementation_do.md, stage sizing. Signed naming and real-browser acceptance required more than fifty lines each, while remaining bounded stages well under two hours. Prefer elapsed/behavioral boundaries over approximate line-count guidance for security and acceptance coverage.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step4_implementation_do.md, stage artifact and summary commit rule. Recording the explicitly requested guest-name adjustment with its focused and browser verification keeps the completed implementation reviewable. Retain this rule.

No supported findings.