zenmemes Platform Docs Download

Repository source: docs/plans/iphone_reply_submit/iphone_reply_submit_debug_log.md

iPhone reply submit — Railspike debug log

2026-10-20T06:10:03Z — Step 1

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step1_solution_assessment.md, Structure and Guardrails. Comparing three approaches at a high level exposed that placing Post above the editor alone does not guarantee keyboard-open visibility. Retain the option comparison and concise recommendation requirements.
Source: docs/railspike/RAILSPIKE.md, Key Rules and Step 1 review gate. The assessment separates the recommended direction from implementation authorization and identifies actual iPhone evidence as pending. Retain the explicit approval boundary.

No supported findings.

Source: docs/railspike/RAILSPIKE.md, Experimental Effort Estimation. The host ledger lists the overlapping E04 candidate as proposed, with no active selection. This request authorizes Step 1 planning but does not explicitly select participation in the study; no study score or ledger update was added.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step1_solution_assessment.md, Deliverable (one-page limit). The assessment is concise Markdown; physical page length depends on rendering. No paginated rendering was checked.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step2_feature_description.md, Known user or environment and Completion boundary. Naming both actual iPhone browsers and failure/retry evidence prevents the simulated mockups from being treated as acceptance. Retain these requirements.
Source: the same file, Shared component inventory. Inspection identified Forte as a shared-form consumer despite its exclusion from redesign; the description now explicitly requires regression coverage. Retain this inventory requirement.

No supported findings.

Source: the same file, Delivery scope, documentation-only branch. The approved direction is an application change; documentation-only file restrictions do not apply. Retain for documentation deliverables.

Actual iPhone access and viewport feasibility remain unresolved. The risk and release boundary explicitly retain these dependencies; no device evidence is claimed.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_do.md, material risk and environment acceptance requirements. The plan makes actual-device feasibility a prerequisite and separately replays failure/retry in final device acceptance. Retain these requirements; they prevent desktop evidence from closing the iPhone request.
Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_before.md, request reconciliation. The desktop question is recorded as a clarification of the approved preservation requirement, with explicit non-activation checks. Retain this reconciliation.

No supported findings.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_after.md, one-page and stage sizing checks. The required risk, contract, per-stage fields and verification coverage make literal one-page rendering uncertain. Stages are bounded work sessions; external device waiting is excluded. Implementation must split a stage before starting if source inspection shows it exceeds the one-hour target.
Device access has not been established. Stage 1 records this as a blocking dependency for implementation, not an assumed capability or completed check.

Source: RAILSPIKE.md, Planning Artifacts and Step 4 commit cadence; step4_implementation_before.md, planning-doc gate. The approved plans were organized and committed as 3e124a39 before the summary and implementation; stages are separately recorded as 3e5023f9, 68220bb3, and 2ed58257. Retain the auditable planning/implementation boundary.
Source: step4_implementation_do.md, Stage Boundary Protocol and canonical contract reuse. The feature extends the existing reply form and keeps its actual submit buttons in place; existing signing, anonymous, menu and attachment behavior stay on their original contracts. Focused and isolated real-route tests detected initialization and theme regressions. Retain these requirements.
Source: step4_implementation_after.md, checks must be qualified and known-user recovery must be recorded. The final summary separates desktop-engine evidence from actual iPhone keyboard acceptance, which remains pending. Real-route failure/retry tests establish preserved drafts and one persisted reply for both entry points. Retain the evidence distinction.

No supported findings.

Source: RAILSPIKE.md, Experimental Effort Estimation. This cycle was not selected; no rating or ledger mutation was needed.
Source: Step 4 documentation-only and migration/release guidance. This cycle changes application presentation with no schema migration or authorized production deployment; the summary records those checks as inapplicable.

Source: the approved Stage 1 actual-device-first dependency. No iPhone infrastructure was available. The user explicitly directed completion before their device testing, overriding this prerequisite while retaining actual-device acceptance as pending. Preserve this distinction; do not interpret the workaround as a device pass or as permission to weaken other cycles' gates.
Source: instruction phase order. The After file was initially read alongside verification context before Stage 3 completion, then reread after the stage commit. No early completion or deployment was claimed; retain the required phase order in future execution.