zenmemes Platform Docs Download

Repository source: docs/plans/scripture_response_reliability_revision/scripture_response_reliability_revision_debug_log.md

Scripture Response Reliability Revision Railspike Debug Log

2026-10-16T21:04:33+00:00 — Step 1

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step1_solution_assessment.md, options and recommendation. Comparing quotation-only repair, combined judgment repair, and editorial revision makes clear why fixing false rejections alone cannot meet the measured need. Retain the tradeoff comparison.
Source: docs/railspike/RAILSPIKE.md, Plan review and commit discipline. A separate uncommitted follow-up preserves the approved predecessor and failed evidence while making the revised scope reviewable. Retain the review boundary.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step1_solution_assessment.md, one-page limit. The assessment is compact, but physical page count depends on rendering; retain concision and clarify the limit with a word budget.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step1_solution_assessment.md, Review and revision. The user's proposed further model upgrade changes the recommendation to a matched full-size-writer comparison, while preserving the original query and distinguishing a proposal from a live configuration change. Retain explicit revised direction and compatible-option comparison.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step1_solution_assessment.md, one-page limit. Four options plus current model provenance make physical page length renderer-dependent. Retain the four-option ceiling and use an explicit word budget to clarify the length constraint.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step2_feature_description.md, Core requirements and Completion boundary. Scripture-only writer selection and normal request/Expand/recovery scope prevent an experimental model change from altering unrelated modes or being mistaken for release acceptance. Retain these explicit boundaries.
Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step2_feature_description.md, Risks. Separating quotation bypasses, judgment/latency, and compatibility/spend makes their early validation and release blockers reviewable before development planning. Retain explicit risks and mitigations.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step2_feature_description.md, one-page limit and required sections. The document includes inherited numeric gates rather than leaving them implicit; rendered page count remains layout-dependent. Clarify a word budget or permit a linked acceptance-contract reference.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_do.md, Key Risks and dependency resolution. Explicit quotation-origin, deadline-role and model-routing risks require stub proof before paid comparison. Retain dependency gates rather than assuming a larger writer repairs application rejection.
Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_do.md, Completion Contract. Naming the current-behavior control separately from the repaired mini/Sol comparison preserves the approved relative acceptance gates without requiring Sol to improve four already-correct mini answers. Retain an explicit baseline and candidate-selection contract.
Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_after.md, approval/commit boundary. Regression calls, matched selection and conditional expansions now share one proposed 76-writing/152-moderation/$10 ceiling; drafting does not authorize spending. Retain review before branching or implementation.

Source: docs/railspike/docs/workflow/step3_development_plan_after.md, one-page limit. The stage overview links a separately reviewable Step 3 protocol for frozen cases, comparison/gate details and budget, avoiding a long combined document. Both files are explicitly included in the requested Step 3 approval scope. Physical page count remains layout-dependent; clarify a word budget and supporting-protocol convention.

Source: step4_implementation_before.md, planning commit and organization gate. Dedicated branch and planning commit preserved the approved three-arm comparison and budget separately from implementation. Retain; one moved predecessor-report link was corrected at handoff.
Source: step4_implementation_do.md, stage verification and commit cadence. Five stage commits distinguish contract, routing, publication, harness and paid evidence; the failure is attributable to a remaining application guard rather than assumed model inability. Retain stage-scoped evidence.
Source: RAILSPIKE.md, scope/approval boundaries, and the approved Step 3 dependency contract. Failed regression qualification stopped before costly fresh trials and expansions, retaining the unchanged release criteria and avoiding post-result tuning. Retain explicit gate-dependent execution.

Source: step4_implementation_after.md, confirmation that all planned stages completed and minimum 1 + stage count. Conditional Stages 6–7 were ineligible after failed Stage 5; no completion or promotion is claimed. Clarify that an evaluation stop should record all executed stage commits and explicitly unrun dependents rather than create empty implementation commits.

Source: RAILSPIKE.md, exact Approved Step 3 phrase. The user said go ahead with original plan after discussing its cost, clearly authorizing the original plan under the higher-priority session instruction. No additional confirmation was requested. Consider accepting unambiguous natural-language approval while retaining scope and budget evidence.

Source: step4_implementation_do.md, stage verification and summary/commit cadence. The local correction retains a reproducible saved-document regression, adversarial oracles, and a separate follow-up summary without altering frozen trial outcomes. Retain stage-scoped evidence and history.
Source: RAILSPIKE.md, scope boundaries. User continuation authorized the previously proposed local parser repair; preserving the inactive candidate and failed paid gates prevented a parser replay from being presented as release qualification. Retain explicit distinction between local correctness and live acceptance.

Source: step4_implementation_after.md, release/deployment verification. This follow-up is a local correction only; the paid qualification remains failed and deployment is outside scope. Keep those checks conditional on release scope.