-
Scripture response evaluation
This comparison uses the frozen cases and acceptance criteria in the approved development plan.
docs/plans/scripture_response_quality/evaluation/README.md Plans Plans and history
-
Initial comparison: no qualifying candidate
The faster configuration demonstrates a latency improvement, but neither revised candidate meets the approved quality gate.
docs/plans/scripture_response_quality/evaluation/report.md Plans Plans and history
-
results.json
docs/plans/scripture_response_quality/evaluation/results.json Plans Plans and history
-
Scripture Response Quality Railspike Debug Log
No supported findings for this revision.
docs/plans/scripture_response_quality/scripture_response_quality_debug_log.md Plans Plans and history
-
Scripture Response Quality and Latency Step 1 Solution Assessment
We've been iterating on this issue for a bit now.
docs/plans/scripture_response_quality/scripture_response_quality_step1_solution_assessment.md Plans Plans and history
-
Scripture Response Quality and Latency Step 2 Feature Description
Scripture replies can take nearly a minute yet overwhelm ordinary questions with repeated advice and loosely applied passages.
docs/plans/scripture_response_quality/scripture_response_quality_step2_feature_description.md Plans Plans and history
-
Scripture Response Quality and Latency Development Plan
docs/plans/scripture_response_quality/scripture_response_quality_step3_development_plan.md Plans Plans and history
-
Scripture Response Quality and Latency Implementation Summary
Planning commit: 075f91e7.
docs/plans/scripture_response_quality/scripture_response_quality_step4_implementation_summary.md Plans Plans and history